Willington Fruit Farm

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Outdoor market
  • Consumer demand
  • Food processing firm
  • Profit on produce
  • Wholesalers profit

Willington Fruit Farm

Header Banner

Willington Fruit Farm

  • Home
  • Outdoor market
  • Consumer demand
  • Food processing firm
  • Profit on produce
  • Wholesalers profit
Wholesalers profit
Home›Wholesalers profit›Bankruptcy Court Allows Continuation of Lawsuit Limiting Default Interest and Subordination Claim, But Dismisses Fraudulent Transfer Claim | King and Spalding

Bankruptcy Court Allows Continuation of Lawsuit Limiting Default Interest and Subordination Claim, But Dismisses Fraudulent Transfer Claim | King and Spalding

By Marsha A. Jones
April 21, 2022
0
0

On February 25, 2022, Judge Christopher J. Panos of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts granted in part and denied in part an assignee lender’s motion to dismiss claims brought by a group of affiliated debtors. The court first found that the debtors plausibly alleged that the lender SHS ACK, LLC was not entitled to default interest. He then considered the debtors’ assertions that the lender’s bankruptcy claim should be made conditional – asking whether the complaint alleged that the plaintiff “engaged in unfair conduct”, that the alleged wrongdoing “caused a prejudice to creditors” or had given the plaintiff “an unfair advantage,” and the subordination would not “conflict with the provisions of the federal bankruptcy law”. The court held that the debtors’ claims, although somewhat conclusive, were sufficient to state a fair subordination claim because: (a) the claim was obtained for an improper purpose – to give SHS leverage to attempt to recover the debtors – and (b) the aggressive tactics of the lender’s instruction to his predecessor to unduly charge default interest harmed debtors by forcing them into bankruptcy.

The bankruptcy court then considered the debtors’ fraudulent transfer requests. The debtors alleged that one of the debtors granted SHS a mortgage without receiving any consideration in return while the entity was insolvent. SHS argued that the debtors’ claim should fail because, among other things, the debtors had not alleged any facts demonstrating that the debtor concerned was insolvent. Because the debtors’ insolvency petition was conclusive and lacked specificity as to the value of the entity’s assets, liabilities, or capital requirements, the bankruptcy court denied that petition with leave to repeat the ask in more detail.

The deal is NESV Ice, LLC vs. SHS ACK, LCC (In re NESV Ice, LLC), No. 21-ap-1093 (Bankr. D. Mass. February 25, 2022). The debtors are represented by Downes McMahon LLP. SHS is represented by Curran Antonelli, LLP. The order is available here

Related posts:

  1. Recon Software for Financial Services Market Impressive Earnings Including Major Players ReconArt, SmartStream, BlackLine, Adra, Fiserv Inc
  2. Point of Sale (POS) Software for the Retail Market Impressive Earnings Including Major Players AAndB POS Solutions, Salesforce, Lightspeed – The Courier
  3. This Flipkart seller launched a brand of dried fruits during the pandemic and is looking to earn Rs 10 Cr revenue this year
  4. Live markets, Monday June 28, 2021

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021

Categories

  • Consumer demand
  • Food processing firm
  • Outdoor market
  • Profit on produce
  • Wholesalers profit

Recent Posts

  • Canada Goose predicts upbeat annual sales and profits on China recovery hopes
  • Why You Should Adopt Stinging Nettles
  • Can B Corp. reports first trimester
  • Vine Street Market in O’Fallon IL opens fourth season
  • Bankrupt Country: Fawad